Area 52

Area 52

The Colonel invited the Mayor and her staff for a day-long tour of Dugway Proving Ground.  Finally, I would have the chance to pass through the heavily-guarded gates and see Utah’s legendary Area 52.  “Let’s get a few things out of the way,” the Colonel began.  “Yes, we have the aliens.  Yes, we have the UFOs.  And, yes, we have secret tunnels connecting us to Area 51.”  I knew, of course, he must be joking, of course, but he was a U.S. Army Colonel, Commander of the nation’s advanced biological and chemical weapons defensive testing facility.  “I’m joking, of course.”

Test Tube to Battlefield: Dugway Proving Ground tests and evaluates . . . almost all U.S. Department of Defense . . . chemical and biological defense capabilities, ensuring the equipment will work as expected and properly protect our Soldiers, Airmen, Sailors, Marines, and first responders.  Items tested include protective masks, suits, boots and gloves, chemical and biological agent detectors, and decontamination systems.

One hundred miles south of Berlin sat Dresden, capitol of old Saxony, an artistic center, maker of fine porcelains, performer of symphonies and dramas and operas, host of high church architecture, collector of Bernardo Bellotto paintings.  But in February 1945, eight hundred Allied aircraft pummeled the city with bombs, avoiding the strategic manufacturing areas and railroads, instead obliterating churches, music halls, museums, and neighborhoods.  Incendiary bombs ignited thousands of tenements, and the flames raced and leapt and burst into ravaging firestorms.  When the chaos cooled, rescuers stepped into a soup of bodies liquified in the kilns of brick bomb shelters.  Heaps of charred corpses dotted the streets like gruesome smoking haystacks.  The theory was that such punishing damage and death among the Dresden populace would cause Germany to lose heart and quit the fight.  Instead, Propaganda Minister Goebbels transformed the twenty thousand casualties into two hundred fifty thousand (250,000) civilian assassinations.  Germany, incensed, dug in.  And a dismayed world wondered why Dresden was destroyed.

For hours, we toured the chemical weapons testing laboratories, the biological agent study facilities, and the UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) hangars.  I asked questions, like, “What do you see as the emerging chemical and biological threats to our nation’s defenders?” and “How does today’s state of chemical and biological readiness compare to the height of the Cold War?”  We are ready, our guide summarized.  And I felt enormous pride in my country and in Dugway’s defensive capabilities.

“There in the distance you can see the old German city we built in 1942 to study the most effective methods of destroying German construction.”  Boxy burned-out buildings, windowless, roofless, the blackened brick still standing after eighty years.  It occurred to me that bombing this pretend German city must have informed the attack upon Dresden, and without conscious intention I said the name “Dresden” aloud.  The Chief of Staff whipped his face toward mine and reproached, “It is profoundly unfair to judge the actions of yesterday by the morality of today.”

“I didn’t mean to . . .” I wanted to say, but upon quick reflection, I guess I did mean to, to raise the moral question of Dresden.  I thought of twenty thousand civilians scorched and melted and dead.  Could he be right? I wondered.  Can one’s actions be evaluated only in the context of one’s culture and time?  Cannot today’s morality condemn yesterday’s atrocity?

I wondered at what millions have wondered and continue to wonder.  Should we convict Thomas Jefferson, who penned in 1776 the earth’s great manifesto on human freedom and dignity and equality, because he fathered six children with Sally Hemings, one of his six hundred lifetime slaves?  Must we condemn George Washington, the great General of the Revolution, because he owned three hundred seventeen humans when he died in 1799?  Ought we to judge Abraham Lincoln, the great emancipator of African slaves, for proposing to ship them back to Africa?  Is it fair to sentence Allied commanders for exterminating twenty thousand German civilians in one day in one city in a failed bid to end the evil Nazi Reich?  And what about Hiroshima and Nagasaki?  And, and, and . . . .

These are bedeviling questions.  And all the answers are right and wrong together.  In The Color of Law, Richard Rothstein proposes, “We can judge yesterday’s leaders by standards that were readily available to them in their own time.”  And I ruminate over Dresden and Dugway.

 

Images used pursuant to the Fair Use doctrine.  Top image attributed to Fred Ramage/Getty Images.

7 thoughts on “Area 52

  1. Patricia Ann

    And, and, and is right. The questions never end because the true answers also get obliterated in humanity’s ongoing struggle for power. Power is never power until it is used powerfully to help the powerless.

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply
  2. Jeanette Davis

    Honestly, I struggle with this question. In a case of Hiroshima if we had not dropped the bomb, there would have been estimated millions more casualties. That is according to Ken Burns. And yet… it was devastating. Can you justify it?

    The church also uses this justification for a lot of the blemishes on its history. That it was a different time and cultural context. Well, racism is still racism. And sexism is still sexism. And and and…

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
    1. Donald W. Meyers

      With Hiroshima, we have the advantage of 20/20 hindsight. From the perspective of Harry Truman, Chester Nimitz and others, they saw what happened on Iwo Jima and Okinawa, where U.S. Marines (including Elder Neal A. Maxwell), had to fight for every inch of the island against defenders who were determined to take as many people with them in a version of Ragnarok. They were expecting even more on the home islands, and the atomic bomb was a way to convince Japan’s warlords to surrender without the mindless slaughter that would take place for both sides in a land invasion. I would also submit that the atomic bombings in Japan helped us avert further nuclear war by showing us the long-lasting devastation these weapons could create.

      Yes, there are blemishes in church history, such as the priesthood ban, but we have to remember that the early Saints were products of their time, and that the Restoration was a massive paradigm shift. As a convert, I can testify to the changes that need to be made in thinking and customs when getting on the covenant path, and I’m grateful for the example of you and your family in helping to flatten that learning curve. But the early members of the Church didn’t have that advantage, as they were the vanguard, so they were going to make mistakes and take longer. But if you also compare them with the people of their time, you’ll see they came a lot farther than their contemporaries did in enlightenment.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply
  3. Donald W. Meyers

    As someone who regularly delves into history for both work and pleasure, I have to continually remind myself that “the past is a foreign country.” I’ll be going through microfilmed copies of the newspaper I work for and cringe at some of the racist language, objectification of women (even in straight news stories) and other things that were deemed acceptable in the past. While we have to accept the fact that those things were deemed acceptable at that point in history and culture, we can also look at them and vow to do better.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

I would enjoy hearing from you. Please drop me a line.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s